To my understanding, rhetorical analysis means to take a
deeper look at a text to find out whether or not it is persuasive and exactly how
and why that is. I think the questions that the text proposes; “does it move
your heart, win your trust, and change your mind?” ties back to whom your
targeted audience is and what emotions might appeal to them using, pathos, ethos,
or logos.
I thought the Bob Dylan example was shocking yet interesting
deeper look at a text to find out whether or not it is persuasive and exactly how
and why that is. I think the questions that the text proposes; “does it move
your heart, win your trust, and change your mind?” ties back to whom your
targeted audience is and what emotions might appeal to them using, pathos, ethos,
or logos.
I thought the Bob Dylan example was shocking yet interesting
in the fact that besides the shock factor there was a deeper story. I think it
explained rhetorical analysis very well in the sense that there might be more
than meets the eye when analyzing what makes an argument successful and
why.
explained rhetorical analysis very well in the sense that there might be more
than meets the eye when analyzing what makes an argument successful and
why.
A little off topic but the one company that comes to mind as being very persuasive is Dove, and their real beauty campaign. I’m sure most people have heard of it, seen their videos or ads but I think they really do pose a strong argument.Pathos is most definitely an obvious factor in their argument, because it is directed to women, especially young women and it is
emotionally relatable. Secondly they use ethos to promote that Dove is not a normal beauty product but a product that promotes self-care. Lastly logos is a part of their campaign as
they hope women will identify themselves as a unique, strong, and beautiful
independent that will take action to help others feel the same.
they hope women will identify themselves as a unique, strong, and beautiful
independent that will take action to help others feel the same.
I found the Finding Evidence chapter to be overall very informative, however I mostly focused
on the interview section since that is our next assignment. When it comes to
interviews I almost always find myself not knowing whether or not I have
prepared the right questions, so its nice to know that by preparing BOTH
factual and especially open-ended questions, you should be able to get enough information
without having to cover all of your questions.
interviews I almost always find myself not knowing whether or not I have
prepared the right questions, so its nice to know that by preparing BOTH
factual and especially open-ended questions, you should be able to get enough information
without having to cover all of your questions.
Hi Kari,
ReplyDeleteYou made some very insightful comments regarding this week's readings.
You wrote:
"I think the questions that the text proposes; “does it move your heart, win your trust, and change your mind?” ties back to whom your targeted audience is and what emotions might appeal to them using, pathos, ethos, or logos."
I also found that quote very interesting, especially how it ties into / builds upon our understanding of Rhetoric. I used the same quote myself in my post as I found it to be an interesting way of saying "rhetoric" without actually saying "rhetoric". And they even gave a definition of "rhetoric". Pretty clever.
pathos = win your hearts
ethos = win your trust
logos = change your mind
I forgot to mention that I totally copied your link to the youtube video that has BOTH Dylan at the press conference and the Victoria Secret commercial. I had just the commercial. Nice find! I hope you don't mind me snagging that. :)
ReplyDeleteKari,
ReplyDeleteI like your idea that Rhetorical Analysis is taking a deeper look to find out more than just the persuasiveness and target audience of an artifact. Your statement, "more than meets the eye" was great.
Good choice of the Dove ad and picking out the Pathos, Ethos, and Logos.
I agree with your thoughts on interview questions.